Shall I go for Patent or Design for my Invention ?

by

Shall I go for Patent or Design for my Invention?

patent or design taking decision for invention
patent or design: deciding on invention

Table of Contents

When you have an invention that has aesthetic elements along with functional elements, the natural question would be, Do I need a Utility Patent (Patent) protection or Do I need design patent protection? what would be appropriate considering the budget, timeline, extent of protection, and scope for making money with it. In this article, we will know more about these points to help you make the right decision.

Scope of Protection:

Patents: Patents protect new inventions or discoveries, providing exclusive rights to the inventor for a limited period (usually 20 years). The protection extends to the underlying principles, functionalities, and methods of operation of the invention. This is a broad form of protection that can cover various aspects of an innovation.

Design Registrations: Design registrations, on the other hand, focus on protecting the visual appearance or ornamental features of a product. This is more limited in scope and does not cover the functional aspects or underlying principles of the design.

Duration of Protection:

Patents: The protection offered by a patent lasts for a longer duration, typically 20 years from the filing date. This extended period allows inventors to exclusively exploit their inventions for a more extended timeframe, promoting innovation and investment in research and development.

Design Registrations: Design protection is generally shorter in duration, lasting for 15 years from the date of registration. This makes it suitable for safeguarding the aesthetic aspects of a product for a limited period.

Some of the benefits of patent protection over design protection are:

  • A patent covers the technical aspects of an invention, such as its function, process, or method, whereas a design only covers the appearance of a product, such as its shape, pattern, or color.
  • A patent can protect a wider range of inventions, such as machines, software, or chemical compositions, whereas a design can only protect products that have a visual appeal and are not purely functional.
  • A patent can prevent others from copying, using, or selling the invention, even if they come up with the same idea independently, whereas a design can only prevent others from making products that are substantially similar to the registered design.
  • A patent can provide a competitive advantage and a source of revenue for the inventor, as they can license or sell their patent rights to others, whereas a design may have a lower market value and a shorter lifespan.

The benefits of patent over design registration for making money are:

  • A patent can generate more revenue for the inventor by licensing or selling the patent rights to others, whereas a design may have a lower market value and a shorter lifespan.
  • A patent can prevent others from copying, using, or selling the invention, even if they come up with the same idea independently, whereas a design can only prevent others from making products that are substantially similar to the registered design.
  • A patent can provide a competitive advantage and a source of innovation for the inventor, as they can use their patent rights to create new products or improve existing ones, whereas a design may not offer much scope for further development.

Patent protection generally offers several advantages over design protection when it comes to making money, especially in terms of monetizing intellectual property. Here are some key advantages:

1. Exclusive Rights to Functional Aspects:

  • Patents: Patents protect not only the visual appearance of an invention but also its functional aspects. This exclusivity allows the patent holder to prevent others from making, using, selling, or importing the patented invention, providing a strong market advantage.
  • Designs: Design protection, on the other hand, primarily focuses on the ornamental or aesthetic aspects of a product. While it prevents the unauthorized reproduction of the visual design, it may not address the functionality or underlying principles of the invention.

2. Monopoly Control and Market Exclusivity:

  • Patents: Patents grant a monopoly to the inventor, allowing them exclusive rights to exploit the patented invention. This monopoly control can be leveraged to charge higher prices for products or license the technology to others, creating revenue streams.
  • Designs: Design protection, while preventing exact replicas of the visual design, may not provide the same level of market exclusivity. Competitors can still introduce products with different designs, potentially limiting the ability to command premium prices.

3. Licensing Opportunities:

  • Patents: Patent holders can license their patented technology to third parties, allowing others to use, manufacture, or sell products based on the patented invention. Licensing agreements can be lucrative, providing a passive income stream for the patent holder.
  • Designs: While design licensing is possible, it is often limited to the specific visual design, and the revenue potential may be lower compared to licensing patented technologies with broader applications.

4. Strategic Partnerships and Collaborations:

  • Patents: Companies with patented technologies may enter into strategic partnerships or collaborations with other businesses looking to leverage the patented innovations. This can lead to joint ventures, research partnerships, and other mutually beneficial arrangements.
  • Designs: While a distinctive design can enhance a product’s market appeal, it may not be as conducive to forming strategic partnerships as functional and technological innovations protected by patents.

5. Innovation Leadership and Branding:

  • Patents: Obtaining patents showcases a commitment to innovation and can enhance a company’s reputation as a technological leader. This can positively impact brand image and customer perception, potentially leading to increased sales and market share.
  • Designs: While a unique visual design can contribute to branding, it may not convey the same level of technological innovation and leadership that comes with patenting novel and inventive technologies.

6. Defensive Strategy Against Competitors:

  • Patents: Patents not only enable the patent holder to monetize their inventions but also serve as a defensive strategy against potential infringement lawsuits. The threat of legal action can deter competitors from entering the market with similar technologies.
  • Designs: Design protection primarily addresses the risk of imitation in terms of visual appearance but may not provide the same level of deterrent against functional similarities.

Examples with Case Details:

Patent Example: Case: In 2008, Indian pharmaceutical company Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories obtained a patent for a process to manufacture a generic version of Imatinib Mesylate, a cancer drug. Novartis, the holder of the original patent, challenged Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories in court.
Outcome: The Supreme Court of India upheld Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories’ right to produce the generic version, stating that the improved process was innovative and fulfilled the criteria for patent protection. This case demonstrates how patents protect novel processes, allowing for competition in the pharmaceutical industry.

Design Registration Example: Case: Apple Inc. filed a design registration for the ornamental design of the iPhone in India. Subsequently, a local manufacturer produced smartphones with a similar appearance, leading to a legal dispute.

The design registration allowed Apple to protect the distinctive visual features of the iPhone. However, the scope of protection was limited to the specific design elements. Competitors could still produce smartphones with different designs that did not infringe on the registered design. This showcases the narrower protection offered by design registrations.

Integrated Protection Example: Case: An automotive company develops a new vehicle with a unique design and innovative engine technology. By obtaining both a design registration for the vehicle’s appearance and a patent for the engine technology, the company secures comprehensive protection.

The design registration protects against imitations of the vehicle’s appearance, while the patent prevents competitors from using the same engine technology. This integrated approach maximizes the protection of the company’s investment in both design and technological innovation.

In summary, while design registrations are valuable for safeguarding the visual aspects of a product, patents offer broader protection by covering the underlying principles and functionalities of inventions. Depending on the nature of the innovation, a comprehensive IP strategy may involve both design registrations and patents to ensure comprehensive protection. Patent protection offers a broader and more potent set of tools for making money compared to design protection. The ability to control the functional aspects of an invention, license the technology, and establish market exclusivity makes patents a valuable asset for monetization and commercial success.

Prasad Karhad
Latest posts by Prasad Karhad (see all)