How Patent Attorneys Review First Examination Report (FER) or Office action and Prepare Responses for the Patent Office

by

How Patent Attorneys Review First Examination Reports (FER) or Office action and Prepare Responses for the Patent Office

The First Examination Report (FER), also referred to as an office action, is a critical stage in the patent prosecution process. It is issued by the patent office after an examiner has conducted a thorough review of the patent application, including its claims, specifications, and drawings. The FER outlines objections, rejections, or formalities that must be addressed by the applicant to move the application closer to grant. Responding effectively to an FER requires expertise, precision, and strategy, which is why engaging a patent attorney is crucial. Below, we delve into how patent attorneys review the FER and prepare responses to be filed at the patent office.

Understanding the FER: A Patent Attorney’s Perspective

When the FER is issued, it typically contains:

  1. Technical Rejections: Pertaining to novelty, inventive step (non-obviousness), and industrial applicability of the claims.
  2. Formal Objections: Related to formatting, incomplete disclosures, or lack of clarity in claims or specifications.
  3. Citations: Prior art documents or references used to question the patentability of the invention.
  4. Legal Grounds: Objections based on adherence to patent laws, such as Section 3 of the Indian Patent Act or other equivalent provisions globally.

Patent attorneys begin by meticulously analyzing the FER to understand the examiner’s concerns and the grounds for objections. Their goal is to ensure that each objection is addressed comprehensively to maximize the chances of the patent application being granted.

Steps Involved in Reviewing the FER

  1. Detailed Analysis of Examiner’s Remarks:
    • Claim-by-Claim Review: Each claim is scrutinized to determine which objections apply and to identify their severity.
    • Prior Art Examination: The attorney reviews the prior art cited by the examiner to assess its relevance and impact on the novelty and inventive step of the invention.
    • Legal Grounds Check: The cited legal provisions are evaluated for validity and applicability to the case.
  2. Understanding the Client’s Invention:
    • The attorney consults with the inventor or applicant to fully understand the invention’s technical nuances, its innovative aspects, and its applications. This is critical for crafting a response that highlights the invention’s strengths.
  3. Identifying Deficiencies or Misinterpretations:
    • Often, FER objections arise from misinterpretation or lack of clarity in the original application. The attorney identifies these areas and prepares to clarify or amend them.
  4. Strategizing the Response:
    • The response strategy depends on the type of objections raised:
      • Technical Objections: These are countered by providing evidence of the invention’s novelty and inventive step, often through detailed technical arguments.
      • Formal Objections: These are addressed by correcting any deficiencies in formatting, terminology, or clarity.
      • Prior Art Arguments: When prior art is cited, the attorney may highlight distinctions between the cited references and the claimed invention to demonstrate patentability.

Drafting the Response to the FER

Once the FER has been thoroughly reviewed, the patent attorney begins drafting the response. This document serves as a rebuttal to the objections raised and often includes the following:

  1. Introduction and Overview:
    • A summary of the application and a brief acknowledgment of the FER.
    • Identification of the key objections raised by the examiner.
  2. Detailed Rebuttal to Objections:
    • For Prior Art Citations: Each cited reference is discussed in detail, highlighting differences between the invention and the prior art. Comparative charts, technical explanations, or experimental data may be included.
    • For Formal Objections: Amendments to the claims or specifications are proposed to address issues of clarity, scope, or structure.
  3. Amendments to Claims or Specifications (if necessary):
    • Claims may be reworded, narrowed, or grouped to overcome objections without compromising the invention’s scope.
    • The specification may be revised to improve clarity or completeness.
  4. Supporting Documents:
    • Any additional evidence, technical documents, or legal precedents that strengthen the response are included.
  5. Closing Remarks:
    • A concluding statement that reiterates the applicant’s request for reconsideration and highlights the patentability of the invention.

Filing the Response

Once the response is finalized, it is submitted to the patent office within the prescribed deadline, typically six months from the issuance of the FER (extendable in some jurisdictions). The response may also be accompanied by a formal hearing request if the objections are complex or require in-person clarification.

The Role of Expertise and Strategy

The response to an FER is not merely a procedural step; it is a strategic document that lays the groundwork for the successful grant of a patent. A well-drafted response can turn seemingly insurmountable objections into manageable challenges. Patent attorneys employ their legal acumen, technical expertise, and persuasive writing skills to craft responses that satisfy examiners while protecting the client’s interests.

The process of reviewing and responding to an FER is a blend of technical rigor and legal strategy. By engaging a skilled patent attorney, applicants can navigate this critical stage with confidence, ensuring that their invention stands the best chance of being granted patent protection. A thorough and thoughtful response not only addresses the examiner’s concerns but also strengthens the application, paving the way for the innovation to reach its full potential in the marketplace.

Prasad Karhad
Latest posts by Prasad Karhad (see all)